One anonymous lady from Prague, Czech Republic applauds for aldactone their best products. Together with disulfiram her husband they have made use of pill medications and ciprofloxacino the jelly like products so clonidine generic as to improve on their sex life. diflucan yeast infection This lady says they are now enjoying sex fluconazole side effects like never before. In fact they cannot furosemide have enough each other and all these thanks to this torsemide to lasix conversion internet pharmacy. Michael is also a lexapro generic happy and satisfied customer. He has been receiving the domperidone best services and products which have been more methylprednisolone than he could ever imagine. He never thought propranolol for anxiety there was a genuine site out there that strattera generic offers such good services and products. Michael had heard synthroid generic rumors of internet pharmacies defrauding tetracycline clients and providing fake products but he is glad that albuterol sulfate inhaler stands out among the rest. Betty has nothing but buy xenical great accolade for this site for she has found it to be the most reliable supplier.



Oct 20 2010

Why does vendor lock-in get such a bad rap?

In the context of virtualization, vendor lock-in often has negative connotations. But if a company provides solid products and support, this practice of purchasing the bulk of your data center components from a single vendor can be beneficial.

Few vendors have the product lineup to supply every facet of a data center infrastructure, with the exception of Dell Inc., Hewlett-Packard Co., and IBM. But many vendors can fill most IT needs and then bridge the gaps through strategic partnerships. VMware Inc., for example, has teamed up with EMC Corp. and Cisco Systems Inc. to form the Virtual Computing Environment (VCE) coalition. Together, these providers have bundled servers, storage and virtualization capabilities into a single product, which essentially locks customers into their vertical stack.

This tip offers a new way of thinking about vendor lock-in. It covers the pros and cons of this approach to building your virtual infrastructure and provides advice for those who choose a single-vendor approach in a virtual environment.

Read the full article at…


  1. Andrew Fidel

    Because things like the VCE telling you if you upgrade the ram that you’ve voided the support agreement. The more locked into a vendors stack you are the less room you have to negotiate, recently HP was pissing me off a bit about some upgrades we were doing to HP servers with genuine HP parts so I told em if they didn’t want to support their stuff I would gladly switch to Dell or IBM for future server purchases, it’s a bit harder to do that if you have an entire infrastructure bundled from that vendor.

  2. Craig

    no offend about your post, I do not think vBlock is a single solution nor the perfect solution for everything. Look at the config they have, it might not fit for every environment, which they claim to support x amount of VMs. In reality, more details study about what to be virtualized or what to be optimumed are important. VCE may be good idea. vBlock just will not be fit for every scenario. Cisco, VMware & Netapp also provide flexpod and secure multi-tenancy architecture. Rather than part number, the value behind the infrastructure and sizing should be considered too.

Comments have been disabled.