«

»

Feb 08 2017

vExpert 2017 announced and there are still too many vExperts

Last year I wrote how I felt there were too many vExperts and it doesn’t distinguish based on the level of contributions that would qualify someone to earn the vExpert distinction. This year it’s become even worse, almost 1,500 people were named a vExpert based on the simple qualification that they “have demonstrated significant contributions to the community and a willingness to share their expertise with others”. I’m not going to reiterate my opinion on this, you can read all about it in my post last year, I have strong feelings that: a) the bar is too low, b) applications aren’t vetted that well and c) there needs to be classes or levels as there are some that contribute way more than others.

Now I don’t have access to the application data, but a cursory search through the published list for 2017 and looking up a few people on Twitter shows the appearance that some people didn’t do much to earn it. I’ll take one in particular who I will not name, hasn’t blogged since 2015, mostly just re-tweets things on Twitter, works for a partner so can’t be involved in VMUG leadership, so what exactly did they do to earn the vExpert title. Now again, I don’t have access to what they put on their application and unless I’m missing something, just because you have a blog and tweet doesn’t necessarily mean you have made “SIGNIFICANT” contributions to the community.

Now I don’t necessarily blame VMware, 1,500 people is a heck of a lot to process and vet and anyone can pretty much write what they want as justification to become a vExpert on the application. I just feel strongly that some of the people that have put a whole lot more effort into it than others are getting buried in the huge pool and not being called out for their extra effort. The vExpert community started almost 10 years ago recognizing about 300 people and now has grown to 1,500, it seems like anyone with a blog who bangs out a few posts can become a vExpert these days. I initially wrote about my thoughts on what I thought it means to be a vExpert back in 2009. For me being named a vExpert is still an honor but it just doesn’t have the same meaning to me that it did 9 years ago.

I do thank VMware for your hard work to maintain this program year after year, but please try and set the bar higher by redefining “significant” and/or have different classes or levels based on how truly significant a person’s contributions have been for the year. I’d really like this program to have more meaning for me and I can bet there are plenty of others out there that feel the same way.

Share This:

4 comments

2 pings

Skip to comment form

  1. Valdecir Carvalho

    Hi there Eric! I have to agree with you!
    Second time vExpert here. IMHO VMware should think about in create some kind of rank and or be more selective.
    I’m doing my best to spread the world about vExpert here in Brazil, but also, there are some people that even here (18 vExperts in BR) I can’t see their contribution and effort to the community. Well, I’m thankful to be part of this community and I will keep doing my best to truly contribute.
    Cheers!
    VC

  2. Andrea Mauro

    I think that they are trying to make vExpert more like MVP… huge number yes (and I agree that there are too much of them), but now (starting from 2016) some specialization like VSAN and NSX.
    IMHO they have to “copy” also the evaluation criterias from MVP that it’s more strict that vExpert. And be more careful on renewals…
    But I don’t expect that the number can grow (one example: all VCDX are also vExpert).

  3. esiebert7625

    For the MVP there are about 4,000 of them but I think that scales appropriately to the much larger user base that Microsoft has. I know the MVP has much more rigid qualifications and they definitely do not approve everyone that applies. I’d be OK with the number of vExperts that there are now if the entrance criteria was higher. I think VMware is open to making this better, I’m meeting with Corey Romero this week to discuss this.

  4. Graeme

    You’re basing this on what people do “in public”. I know a vExpert who contributes material to certifications for example.

    Some people present sessions at VMUGs as well.

    Another friend of mine who pushes out loads of blog posts didn’t make the cut for vExpert. I think it really depends on the individual and whether they’re credible or not – they’re championing VMware products at the end of the day.

    Like any group, the larger it grows the less exclusive it is but who cares? It’s all about community, not exclusivity. Our success doesn’t diminish when others are also successful, there’s plenty for everyone.

  1. VMware vExpert 2017 - my cloud-(r)evolution

    […] Speziell die Aussage von Eric Siebert in seinem Artikel vExpert 2017 announced and there are still too many vExperts […]

  2. vExpert 2017 duyurusu | v.orcunus.com

    […] konusunda da farklı görüşler oluşmaya başladı. Özellikle Eric Siebert yazdığı makalesinde bunu açık bir şekilde dile getirdi ve hatta vExpert ünvanında kategorizasyona gidilmesi ile […]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>


*

Please answer the following to prove you're not a bot * Time limit is exhausted. Please reload the CAPTCHA.